New Testament standards of interpretation by Joel Smith
How should the Christian
teachings be interpreted? Should they be taken literally at face value or do
they instead need to be explored for hidden, symbolic meanings? Which viewpoint
did Jesus and the founding fathers want us to have?
What examples of
interpretation did Jesus provide us with?
Those who are familiar with his method
of teaching know that Jesus taught by telling parables (Greek: PARABOLAI). These
parables were simple stories drawn from everyday life which hid important
spiritual lessons. They were not intended to be interpreted literally. When
Jesus was asked why he taught by using parables, Jesus replied: "because it has
been given to you to know the mysteries (MUSTERIA) of the kingdom of heaven, but
it has not been given to those... because seeing they do not see, and hearing
they do not hear, nor do they understand." -Matthew 13:11-13
(Interlinear Bible, Jay
Green, Hendrickson Publishers)
Notice that, in this
passage, Jesus characterizes his own teachings as "mysteries". In another
place, we find that Jesus describes his own teachings as "the hidden (KRUPTA)
manna." Manna, of course, was the food which sustained the Jews as they
followed Moses in the wilderness. In other words, Jesus was saying that his
teachings are the "hidden" spiritual food. And then when we look at the
writings of the Apostle Paul, we discover that he too characterizes the
Christian teachings both as "hidden" and as "mysteries". In his first letter to
the Corinthians, for example, Paul wrote: "we speak the wisdom of God in a
mystery (MUSTERIO) having been hidden (AOPOKRUPTO)... so let a man think of us
as ministers of Christ and stewards of the mysteries of God." -1 Corinthians 4:1
(Interlinear Bible)
Jesus and Paul both described the Christian teachings as "hidden" and as
"mysteries". They are not simple. They contain hidden meanings. And they should
not be taken only at face value. In fact, Jesus himself warns that unless these
teachings are correctly interpreted, then it is entirely possible that they
could be both seen and heard but still not understood --- "because
it has been given to you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but
it has not been given to those... because seeing they do not see, and hearing
they do not hear, nor do they understand." -Matthew 13:11-13
The Apostle Peter
confirms that, even back in the earliest days of Christianity, this warning was
already becoming a reality. He wrote that Paul's teachings "contain some obscure passages, which the ignorant and unstable
misinterpret to their own
ruin." -2 Peter 3 (New English Bible) Evidently, even back in
Peter's day, the "hidden"
"mysteries contained in Paul's teachings were being "misinterpreted" by
"ignorant" people.
What is the right way to interpret Paul's "obscure" message?
The answer can be found in his writings where he encourages us to: "earnestly
study to show yourself approved to God, a workman unashamed, rightly dividing (ORTHOTOMEO)
the word of Truth." -2 Timothy 2:15
(Interlinear Bible)
Paul wants us to
"earnestly study" so that we may become intimately familiar with what the
Christian "word of truth" actually says. And then, he wants us to have the
insight to be able to "rightly divide" or to correctly interpret these
teachings. What's the best way to avoid misinterpreting the Christian message?
All we have to do is to follow Paul's example. He tells us, in unmistakable
language, how he "sees" these teachings. Paul wrote: "we speak, not in words
taught us by human wisdom but in words taught us by the Spirit, expressing
spiritual truths in spiritual words. The man without the Spirit does not accept
the things that come from the Spirit of God for they are foolishness to him and
he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually discerned." -1
Corinthians 2:14 (New International Version)
The phrase "spiritually
discerned" is translated from the original Greek PNEUMATIKOS ANAKRINETAI. The
word ANAKRINETAI is derived from another Greek word... KRINO, which means judged
or determined. In other words, this passage can also be correctly translated as
spiritually judged, spiritually determined or spiritually interpreted.
What Paul was trying to
tell us is that literal minded people cannot correctly understand "spiritual
truths" expressed in spiritual language. Paul's teachings must be spiritually
perceived or spiritually interpreted if they are to be "rightly divided". And
this is only one of many statements from Paul's writings which substantiate this
viewpoint.
SARX VS. PNEUMA
One of the most
prominent recurring themes in Paul's writings is the contrast between the flesh
and the spirit. In the original Greek manuscripts of Paul's letters, the Greek
word SARX appears over ninety times. This word is most often translated as
"flesh" and represents the physical, literal, carnal viewpoint. The opposite of
the word SARX is the word PNEUMOS. This word appears over one hundred and thirty
times in Paul's writings and is translated as "spirit". The PNEUMOS represents
the spiritual, non-physical, symbolic view.
One of the best examples
illustrating this contrast between the fleshly, literal outlook and the
non -physical, spiritual perspective can be found in the epistle that Paul wrote
to the Christians of Rome. In this letter he declared: "there is therefore now
no condemnation to those... who do not walk according to the flesh (SARX), but
according to the Spirit (PNEUMOS)... for the mind of the flesh (SARX)
is death;
but the mind of the Spirit (PHRONEMA TOU PNEUMATOS) is life and peace; because
of this the mind of the flesh (SARX) is enmity towards God... those in the flesh
(SARX) are not able to please God... if anyone has not the Spirit
(PNEUMOS) of
Christ, this one is not His... for as many as are led by the Spirit (PNEUMOS)
of God, these are sons of God." -Romans 8
(Interlinear Bible)
When Paul spoke of
"those in the flesh [who] are not able to please God", he certainly was not
implying that anyone who has a physical, fleshly body can't please God. Instead,
he's referring to the "mind of the flesh (SARX)"... the fleshly, literal
attitudes, interpretations and ways of thinking which "are not able to please
God". It is the "mind of the flesh" - being literal minded which is "death."
It is the "mind of the spirit" - having a spiritual viewpoint which "is life".
To make absolutely
certain that Christians don't miss this important point, Paul repeats it again
in another passage. He wrote: "God made us able ministers of a new covenant; not
of letter, but of Spirit (PNEUMOS). For the letter [the literal] kills, but the
Spirit (PNEUMOS) makes alive." -2 Corinthians 3:6
(Interlinear Bible) The literal "kills". The
"mind of the flesh" is "death". But seeing things in terms
of their spiritual meanings breathes life into them and fosters true
understanding.
It was to these kinds of
literal minded people that Jesus was referring when he said "seeing they do not
see and hearing they do not hear, nor do they understand". Literal
interpretation misleads and results in spiritual blindness and
death. Paul's analysis of this problem proved to be frighteningly accurate. As
witnessed by later developments, this literal, fleshly method of interpretation
resulted in the deaths of John the Baptist, Jesus, Peter, Paul, the rest of the
Apostles and thousands...
perhaps even millions of other Christians throughout history.
THE LITERAL KILLS
In his writings, Paul consistently emphasized the spiritual significance of
some things that most people of his day took literally and he provides us with
examples of what he meant when he wrote that "the literal kills".
For example, speaking of
the Jewish initiation rite of circumcision, Paul wrote: "he is a Jew which is
one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit (PNEUMOS),
and not in the letter [the literal]." -Romans 2:29 (King James Version)
Male Jews had been
circumcised "in the flesh" for at least two thousand years before the
time that Paul wrote this passage. To Jews this ritual was not optional. In
fact, for a Jew to not be circumcised would very likely get him shunned by the
community and in some situations it could result in his being killed. According to
Paul however, true circumcision is "in the spirit", an inner spiritual reality
of the "heart" and not literally in the flesh.
Paul certainly was aware of the Jewish interpretation of this ritual and yet he taught that this literal
interpretation was wrong. The only circumcision that Paul recommended was of the
"heart"... or, as he described it in another place, the "circumcision made
without hands". -Colossians 2:11 KJV
Another excellent
example that illustrates this spiritual method of interpretation is found in
Malachi's prophecy foretelling the return of Elijah from heaven. Jesus said
that John the Baptist was the fulfillment of this prophecy. (see the article
about this prophecy elsewhere in this website)
Ask yourself, was the fulfillment of this prophecy literal... something that was
so obvious that no one could miss it? Or, was it instead a "hidden""mystery"...
something which required spiritual "eyes" and "ears" before
its fulfillment
could be understood? If we are to trust Jesus' explanation of the return of
Elijah from heaven, the fulfillment of this prophecy was not literal. It was the
"spirit and power" of Elijah that returned to dwell in John the Baptist, not the
return of a fleshly body from the literal heavens.
"THE SPIRIT GIVES
LIFE..."
Jesus very patiently tried to lead Christians to the recognition and acceptance
of these subtle, inner, spiritual perceptions of his teachings. In the sixth
chapter of the Gospel of John Jesus surprises those around him by asserting "I came down from
heaven." This account states that not only did the rabbis who heard him
say this reject this claim, but it also says that Jesus� own disciples abandoned
him forever when they heard him say this. As he stood there watching his
disciples walk away knowing that they were not going to ever come back, Jesus explains
that he was not speaking literally when he said "I came down from heaven." Jesus
said "it is the spirit (PNEUMA) that gives life; the flesh (SARX)
is of no
avail: the words that I have spoken to you are spirit (PNEUMA)
and life." -John 6:63 (Revised Standard Version)
The "words" of Jesus are "spirit" and his teachings are
fundamentally spiritual in nature. The "mind of the spirit"... the spiritual,
inner symbolic "way" gives "life and peace". This is the "way" that Jesus
wanted us to "see" and to "understand" his words. At the beginning of the Book
of Revelation, Jesus again repeats this critical truth over and over again.
Seven separate times he said: "he that hath an ear let him hear what the spirit
(PNEUMA) sayeth to the churches." -Revelation 2:17
(King James Version)
Why did Jesus repeat
this message seven different times? Can
you see the lesson that he wanted us to learn?
Paul similarly urges Christians to safeguard this inner spiritual understanding
of the Christian message. He cautions:
"Keep before you an
outline of the sound teaching which you heard from me... Guard the treasure put
into our charge... [people will arise] who preserve the outward form of
religion, but are standing in denial of its [inner] reality. For the time will
come when they will not stand wholesome teaching, but will follow their own
fancy... They will stop their ears to the truth and turn to mythology."
-2 Timothy 4:4 (New English Bible)
Paul equates the fleshly, "outward", literal interpretation and practice of
religion with "mythology"... something which to him represented corruption,
ignorance, misinterpretation and apostasy. Have modern Christians remained faithful to the original standards of
spiritual interpretation as expressed by Jesus and Paul? If they haven't --- why
haven't they?